Super Apps, Super UX? Part 1: Lessons in Modular App Architecture from SEA Powerhouse

Super Apps, Super UX? Part 1: Lessons in Modular App Architecture from SEA Powerhouse

You open an app in the morning to check your bills. Instead, you find yourself navigating a maze of promos, loans, and shopping tabs.

Welcome to the double‑edged sword of the super app; more convenience, more complexity.

What begins as a convenience promise can quickly turn into a cluttered, high-friction experience if design and architecture are not aligned. In Southeast Asia, platforms like Grab, DBS PayLah!, and GoTo are showing that scale does not have to mean sprawl.

Read on to see how modular app architecture, clearer UX boundaries, and linked services can deliver “more features, less frustration” without overwhelming the user.

Note: Where platforms don’t name “discoverability” explicitly, we infer it from their published goals (faster builds, fewer regressions, cleaner interfaces) as UX‑driven efforts to reduce friction

1. Grab: Breaking Down the Digital Monolith

The Monolith Problem

Over time, Grab’s single codebase came to include rides, delivery, payments, insurance, micro‑loans, even groceries. They have come to realize that every release meant rebuilding and retesting hundreds of intertwined features; delaying updates, risking regressions, and measuring in seconds of extra startup time felt painful to users.

What Grab Did: Modular App Architecture

  • Developer Benefit: The team refactored into over 1,000 independent modules, forming a modular app architecture with core libraries for networking/UI and separate feature libraries (rides, food, wallet, etc.). Now build tools only recompile the modules that changed, cutting build times by as much as 60%.

Modular App Architecture from Grab Tech Blog

Grab Tech Blog: Modularised App Structure

  • Trade‑Off: Splitting the monolith isn’t free. It introduced extra configuration, longer initial migration, and heavier IDE workloads. Grab engineers admit this was “not an easy or small task,” but ultimately worthwhile.

  • User Benefit: Although every module still ships with the app, behind the scenes this modularity enabled performance optimizations; caching service tiles, lazy‑loading certain assets, and reducing cold‑start latency by around 4 seconds. The result: faster, more predictable launch times and fewer “spinning wheel” moments.

Central Design Tokens

  • To tame visual inconsistency, Grab’s design team created a central token library—standard colors, typography, spacing, and button styles. Every new feature must draw from this set, preserving a cohesive look as services expand.

Test-and-Learn A/B Culture

  • Major UX changes now go through continuous testing. Before a wide rollout, Grab pilots tweaks (e.g. relocating an “Order Again” button) with a small cohort, measuring engagement and satisfaction. Only winners make it into production; minimizing the risk of unwelcome surprises.

Modular App Architecture: Inside Grab, how they bring new products to life

Inside Grab: How Grab brings new products to life through experimentation

The Outcome:

Grab went from an overloaded super-app to a platform built on modular app architecture that feels light, responsive, and seamless; making life easier for both daily users and the teams who build it.


2. DBS PayLah!: Ecosystem Without the Overload

Feature Sprawl & Technical Debt

Originally a simple P2P wallet, PayLah! became cluttered and slow. UX analyses (independent of DBS) observed that the 2018 PayLah! app was “cluttered with a surplus of underutilized features” and that peer-to-peer transfers still “felt sluggish”. Users noted a confusing home screen and extra confirmation steps. Thus the article is correct that adding too many services risked confusing users.

What DBS Did: API‑First & Microservices

  • API Platform: DBS launched one of Asia’s largest banking‑API hubs, exposing over 150 endpoints; everything from wallet top‑ups to reward redemptions. Partners plug in via APIs, removing the need to embed mini‑apps directly into PayLah!’s code.

Modular App Architecture: reimagining banking

DBS Newsroom: Reimagining banking, DBS launches world’s largest banking API developer platform

  • Domain‑Driven Refactoring: Behind the scenes, PayLah! was decomposed into microservices (payments, accounts, promotions), creating a modular app architecture where each component is independently deployable. Release cycles shrank from quarters to weeks, and a single service outage no longer dominoes across the platform.

The Outcome:

PayLah! keeps growing without losing clarity. Users experience a wallet that adapts to their habits, and DBS teams scale the business without scaling “super-app stress.”


3. GoTo: The Power of “Split But Linked”

The Merger Dilemma

After Gojek and Tokopedia united under GoTo, engineers and regulators alike questioned: merge into a single super‑app or keep two? A unified app risked monolithic complexity and ran afoul of Indonesia’s antitrust concerns.

What GoTo Did: Account Linking, Not App Merging

  • Separate Apps, Shared Wallet: Users link their Gojek and Tokopedia accounts to share GoPay balances and loyalty points without cramming ride‑hailing and shopping flows into one overloaded interface.AD 4nXc9nL2YJfOpyjdfEZh5bTRPRQrve9NtJVx40kwW5i7210d1PDj288n7 J9eEbotFQGoUvy8FbrWlBlRetgPZZvXyYTPUnZwSXWjI4Bymtc9FDdlgAyAsLlbKxzfeSXknaphb3Xncw?key=eTf7xWizj 4icDtite7niQvV

Gojek: Link your Gojek account to Tokopedia and enjoy its various benefits!

Accessibility and Micro-Interactions

  • Both apps now support high‑contrast, dyslexia‑friendly, and color‑blind modes, built from shared UI components. Gestures and micro‑animations are standardized, so features introduced in one app immediately feel familiar in the other.

The Outcome:

GoTo’s “split but linked” approach means more people are finding what they need, fast: Millions of extra users are riding and shopping each month, and the total value of transactions has jumped by almost a third. By keeping apps focused but connected, GoTo hasn’t just made life easier for its users. The numbers show it.


Core Lesson: Why Modular Architecture Makes Super Apps Work

Think of super apps like LEGO sets: you can build big, but only if every piece is well-designed and fits cleanly with the others. Grab, DBS PayLah!, and GoTo show that success comes not just from doing more, but from building smarter—so both users and company teams win.

Break: Make Features Modular

  • What it means: Each service lives in its own “block.” Features load only when needed.

  • For users: The app is quicker, less overwhelming; no extra loading for things you don’t use.

  • For teams: Fixes or launches happen fast, with far less risk of breaking other features.

Build: Standardize Design and Process

  • What it means: Every feature or partner uses the same design language and rules.

  • For users: Even as new options appear, everything looks and feels familiar.

  • For teams: No time lost reinventing basics; launches and support are smoother.

Connect: Link Value, Not Clutter

  • What it means: Core app connects to partners and extra features using APIs, so new things appear only when relevant.

  • For users: You get shortcuts and suggestions that genuinely help, not a flood of unwanted menus.

  • For teams: Teams can swap partners or improve sections quickly, keeping the core stable.

In practice:

  • Users enjoy an app that feels lighter, clearer, and more personal, even as features grow.

  • Teams experiment, fix, and scale with less stress and more success.

The Takeaway:

Build super apps like modular, connected LEGO—everyone gets more power, but no one is stuck with extra weight.

Ready to see how SEA’s super apps build trust into every tap? Stay tuned for Part 2.

About the Author:
AY crop

Anna is a User Researcher who enjoys asking the right questions and uncovering patterns behind user behavior. For the past 4 years, she’s turned insights into thoughtful design across fintech, insurance, and media. Off the clock? She bakes, observes, and finds joy in the small details that make experiences feel just right.

Creating Trust Online: How UX Research Helps Banks Win Skeptical Users in Southeast Asia

Creating Trust Online: How UX Research Helps Banks Win Skeptical Users in Southeast Asia

In 2025, digital banking in Southeast Asia is no longer an emerging concept, it’s a rapidly maturing ecosystem. And creating trust online is becoming just as critical as convenience for many fintech companies. 

With smartphone penetration soaring and fintech investments reshaping consumer expectations, more people are banking through apps than ever before. But even as the market grows, one thing remains clear: growth does not automatically build trust.

As explored in How UX Research is Reshaping Digital Banking Strategy in 2025, digital banking UX has moved far beyond fixing interfaces as it now informs how entire financial ecosystems operate. And perhaps no theme highlights this shift more than trust.

In many Southeast Asian countries, digital banking is still gaining traction. The biggest UX challenge isn’t just about speed, it’s about building trust. Before users can feel comfortable navigating a banking app, they need to feel secure. Here, UX isn’t just about making apps easy to use, it’s about ensuring first-time users feel protected.

This article explores why trust must become the foundation of digital banking UX in Southeast Asia and how product teams can design for confidence, not just convenience.

The Trust Problem: Where Digital Banking Falls Short

To understand why trust is important in digital banking, we need to look at what is getting in the way.

Across Southeast Asia, the issue of trust in digital banking remains a well-documented gap. Over half of online consumers in the region have expressed growing concerns around online security when using digital banking and mobile payment services (GSMA, 2024). 

In Malaysia alone, financial scams have led to losses amounting to approximately USD 12.8 billion over the past year, equating to nearly 3% of the country’s GDP (GASA, 2024). When scams are this widespread, it’s no surprise that digital trust is becoming harder to earn and easier to lose.

While security systems are part of the equation, the burden also falls on product and design teams. Gaps in UX—like missing explanations, confusing prompts, or sudden security screens—can create friction that erodes trust even further. These may seem like minor missteps, but in an environment where trust is already fragile, they can break the entire experience.

In Southeast Asia, where fear of scams runs high and digital confidence is still growing, even one moment of hesitation can be the difference between a user staying… or leaving for good. These gaps include:

  • Security uncertainty: Users hesitate when trust indicators (such as encryption badges or verified logos) are absent or unclear, disrupting efforts toward creating trust online
  • Poor transparency: Users are wary when they do not know how or why their data is being used.
  • Brand unfamiliarity: New or digital-only banks struggle to gain credibility in markets where legacy institutions still dominate.
  • Complex onboarding: Lengthy sign-up flows turn away first-time users, especially those with limited access to formal banking.

The question becomes: how do banks bridge this trust gap without losing users along the way?

To answer that, we must turn to the engine behind every confident user interaction: UX research.

How UX Research Makes a Difference

Understanding why trust is important can’t stop at the theoretical phase. It must be observed, tested, and earned through real user insight.

This is where UX research shines. It identifies friction points, uncovers hidden concerns, and offers tangible ways to build confidence. Whether through usability tests, surveys, or ethnographic studies, research reveals what users are really thinking at each step of their digital journey.

For instance, users often abandon a process when asked for sensitive information without proper context. Research pinpoints these moments of hesitation and allows teams to prototype solutions, whether it is shorter forms, more human copy, or visual trust cues (like padlock icons or face ID illustrations) that reassure rather than alarm. This subsequently contributes to creating trust online. 

When teams apply these insights, they not only fix usability but they also build emotional confidence in the product. The goal becomes not just can users use it, but do they feel secure doing so

To see this approach in action, we can look at how banks in Southeast Asia have implemented UX-informed trust strategies.

Local Examples: What Banks Are Doing Right

Trust is not an abstract goal, it is something that can be embedded into product design. And several banks in Southeast Asia have already taken bold steps in that direction.

  • Tonik (Philippines) simplified its onboarding by turning KYC into a fast, branchless selfie-and-ID upload process. This approach supported financial inclusion by making digital banking feel accessible and secure, especially for underserved users.
  • Maybank (Malaysia) responded to increasing scam concerns by implementing cooling-off periods, stronger login security measures and a dedicated fraud hotline—showing that digital trust is also about visible safeguards.
  • DBS (Singapore) leaned into biometric verification to improve call center trust and user convenience, while also ensuring users could reach support through digital-first channels.
  • OCBC (Singapore) introduced “Money Lock”, giving users proactive tools to protect their funds from scams. It is a small but powerful way to return a sense of control to the user.

These efforts are not just one-off features, they represent a broader mindset of designing with trust in mind.

Next, we look at how the goal of creating trust online shows up across the full user journey—not just in security features, but in every interaction.

What Trust Looks Like in UX

Trust is not a single feature, it is the emotional foundation that holds the user journey together. In digital banking, users do not consciously evaluate “security” in a form or “confidence” in a flow. They feel safe when the entire experience is cohesive, respectful, and transparent—essential ingredients for creating trust online.

And when trust is missing, it is not loud. It shows up quietly through hesitation, abandonment, and silence.

To design for trust, UX teams need to embed it at every step. Here is how it should show up in the moments that matter most:

Creating Trust Online: Moments When Trust Matters

In all these moments, trust is not declared, it is earned, quietly, through the consistency and clarity of every interaction. And when UX design is informed by real research, those moments can be anticipated and built with intention.

Final Thought: Trust Is Measurable

Banks that treat trust as a design objective rather than a PR promise are seeing real impact.

Completion rates, customer satisfaction scores, and NPS scores can all reflect trust. More importantly, they help teams identify which changes matter most to real people. UX research provides the lens to evaluate these metrics and the language to advocate for better solutions in creating trust online.

In Southeast Asia, where digital finance continues to evolve rapidly, trust remains one of the most valuable (and vulnerable) currencies. It is not won through slogans, but through design that listens.

And that begins with research; one that goes beyond usability and into long-term strategy. 

For more insights on how UX research is transforming the digital banking landscape in 2025, feel free to revisit our earlier article on the topic.

 

About the Author:
AY crop

Anna is a User Researcher who enjoys asking the right questions and uncovering patterns behind user behavior. For the past 4 years, she’s turned insights into thoughtful design across fintech, insurance, and media. Off the clock? She bakes, observes, and finds joy in the small details that make experiences feel just right.

How UX Research Is Reshaping Digital Banking Strategies in 2025

How UX Research Is Reshaping Digital Banking Strategies in 2025

Imagine this: You urgently need to transfer money, but the banking app crashes mid-transaction. You restart it, but now you’re unsure—did the payment go through? Will you try again?

For a moment, you feel a surge of panic.

But take a deep breath and let’s zoom out for a moment. 

This isn’t just your frustration—it’s happening to millions of banking customers worldwide. In an era where people expect banking to be as seamless as ordering food online, a single bad experience can push customers away for good. This is why UX in banking is no longer just about making things look good—it’s about survival.

In Europe and North America, banks are racing to integrate AI-driven hyper-personalization, anticipating users’ needs before they even arise. Meanwhile, in Southeast Asia, banks are fighting a different battle—building trust among millions of new digital users transitioning from cash-based economies.

But how did UX evolve from usability testing to a strategic pillar in banking? And more importantly—what’s next?

To understand this shift, let’s first explore how UX research is shaping banking strategies in different parts of the world.

How UX Research Shapes Banking Strategy in Southeast Asia vs. Global Markets

Global Banks: AI Knows You Better Than You Do

The modern banking customer no longer waits for problems to happen—they expect their bank to predict and prevent issues before they even occur.

That’s why global banks are shifting towards AI-driven hyper-personalization, using real-time data to craft intelligent, proactive user experiences:

  • Bank of America’s Erica AI assistant doesn’t just remind users to pay their bills—it predicts when they might forget and nudges them in advance.

    Erica AI Assistant from Bank of America

Bank of America’s Erica AI assistant 

  • JPMorgan Chase uses data to spot patterns in your spending, helping customers optimize their finances without them lifting a finger.
  • Emirates NBD (ENBD) provides automated financial coaching through AI, making wealth management accessible to everyday users. 

For these banks, UX isn’t just about usability—it’s about staying ahead of customers’ financial needs.

But while AI and personalization dominate global banking UX, over in Southeast Asia, the challenges are different.

Here, UX is about earning trust.

Southeast Asia: The Battle for Trust

For decades, banks have competed on speed and convenience. But in 2025, the real challenge is trust—especially in Southeast Asia, where digital banking is still gaining traction.

The biggest UX challenge isn’t just about making banking faster—it’s making it feel safe and accessible. According to GSMA’s 2024 survey, over 50% of Southeast Asian consumers worry about online security, and 25% have experienced financial fraud.

Security concerns on banking by SEA Consumers

GSMA Survey: SEA Consumers Raise Online Security Concerns

Here, UX isn’t just about usability—it’s about ensuring first-time users don’t feel overwhelmed or exposed. So how has UX evolved from usability to a strategic driver of banking success? And how do SEA banks compare to their global counterparts? Let’s dive in.

  • Tonik Bank (Philippines) makes opening an account as easy as downloading an app—no paperwork, no long wait times.
  • AEON Bank (Malaysia) focused on “trust-first” design, ensuring security measures didn’t make users feel like they were being locked out of their own money.

SEA vs Global UX Banking

With these different priorities, UX research is now driving the very strategies banks use to compete.

Now that we’ve seen how UX shapes different banking markets, let’s explore how it actively prevents financial stress for customers.

UX Research as the Driving Force Behind Banking Innovation

Preventing Financial Stress

You check your balance and realize you’ve overspent. Sound familiar?

It’s a scenario banks are increasingly working to prevent, using UX research to create proactive interventions before customers even realize they need help.

  • Monzo (UK) doesn’t just warn users about a low balance—it predicts if they’re about to overdraft and sends an alert in advance.
  • Santander Bank (Argentina) revamped its digital platform based on user research, leading to a 20,000+ increase in digital transactions in just one month. 

By identifying pain points before they happen, UX research is shifting banking from reactive problem-solving to proactive customer care.

However, proactive banking requires real-time insights, so how do banks test and improve their UX at such a fast pace?

The answer lies in AI-powered UX testing.

AI-Powered UX Testing

Some banking apps seem to get better overnight. That’s because banks are now using AI to analyze millions of user interactions in real time, automatically detecting friction points and adjusting designs on the fly.

  • Revolut continuously tweaks its interface based on real-world user behavior, ensuring a seamless experience.
  • DBS Bank (Singapore) uses data-driven UX research to make sure digital banking feels as intuitive as visiting a physical branch. 

This shift means UX research isn’t just about designing great experiences—it’s about constantly optimizing them.

But while AI makes banking smoother, it also raises another challenge: How do you balance security with simplicity?

Security vs. Simplicity

Security is non-negotiable in banking, but if security measures feel too frustrating, customers will switch banks.

Some banks are tackling this head-on:

Retail Mobile Banking App UX Design by UXDA

By making security invisible yet effective, these banks prove that UX doesn’t have to come at the cost of customer confidence.

Clearly, UX’s role in banking is now going beyond just design—it’s shaping entire business strategies.

From UX Design to UX Strategy: A Shift in Banking Mindset

UX researchers are no longer just supporting product teams—they’re helping banks make high-level strategic decisions.

  • Commonwealth Bank of Australia created “Hey CommBank,” an AI-powered chatbot that cuts call wait times in half.
  • OCBC Bank embeds UX research into compliance strategies, ensuring that customers can navigate regulations without feeling overwhelmed.

With UX professionals influencing everything from customer service automation to regulatory design, banking is entering a new era where UX is the foundation of strategy.

What’s Next?

Looking ahead, UX will continue to shape how people interact with their banks. Some of the biggest trends to watch include:

  • AI-Driven Hyper-Personalization: Your banking app might soon know what you need before you do. From predicting expenses to detecting fraud in real time, AI is reshaping digital banking.
    Curious how? We broke it down in our article The Future of AI in UX: Trends in 2025—check it out!
  • Embedded Finance: Imagine accessing banking services directly through WhatsApp or TikTok.
  • Regulatory UX: Making compliance effortless for users.
  • Behavior-Driven Banking: Shaping user habits through smarter design.

Banks that fail to invest in UX research will fall behind—not because their tech is outdated, but because their customers will simply go elsewhere.

Conclusion

Think back to that moment of frustration—when your banking app crashed, or when you couldn’t figure out where your money went. Those small moments define how we feel about our banks.

The most successful banks aren’t the ones with the lowest fees or the most advanced AI—they’re the ones that make their users feel secure, understood, and in control.

In the race for digital banking dominance, UX isn’t an afterthought—it’s the winning strategy.

 

About the Author:
AY crop

Anna is a User Researcher who enjoys asking the right questions and uncovering patterns behind user behavior. For the past 4 years, she’s turned insights into thoughtful design across fintech, insurance, and media. Off the clock? She bakes, observes, and finds joy in the small details that make experiences feel just right.