Usability Testing: How Many Test Users (Sample Size) Is Enough? [Updated in 2025]

by | Oct 6, 2021 | UX Strategy & Planning, Usability Testing, User Research, User Testing, UX Guide

Over the years, we have conducted numerous usability tests for a variety of clients and partners. A question that consistently appears is: “How many users are enough for testing?” or “What is an adequate sample size?”.

Long story short, a good baseline is 5 – 10 users. However, to set the right number relevant to the context of your usability test, we need to consider several factors.

In this article, we shall explore briefly about usability testing before we get into how to determine the right sample size.

What is Usability Testing?

Usability testing, also known as user testing or UX testing, is a crucial aspect of user experience (UX) design. It involves evaluating a product’s usability by testing it with representative users. 

The key here is representative users, these are real people who represent your target audience. Usability testing focuses on how real users interact with a product, even at a micro-interaction level.

Usability testing provides a deeper understanding of users and helps identify opportunities to improve user experience and enhance conversion. It also complements quantitative research methods by providing context to data analytics, A/B testing, and market surveys.

To learn more, here are some articles for further reading:

So How Many Users Are Enough for Usability Testing?

While we did say 5 – 10 users is a good baseline, the truth is, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer to the question of how many users are “enough” for usability testing.

The idea of testing with five users, popularized by Nielsen and Landauer (1993), has had a major impact on how we approach testing. The logic is that you get diminishing returns: each additional user gives you less new information, and testing costs more.

Usability Testing Sample Size: Why 5 Users

As the number of users increases, the number of new findings decreases after testing with the first five users.

Source: Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users | NN/g

 

In fact, research shows you can uncover a large chunk (average around 85%) of usability problems by testing with just those first five people.

However, that said research also found out that the minimum percentage of usability problems found with five people was 55%. This highlights that while five users often yields good results, the outcome can vary.

While five is a solid starting point, especially for early-stage testing, it’s not a hard-and-fast rule. A more reliable approach is to aim for 5-10 users, as testing with 10 users will help you discover even more (at least 82%) of the problems.

Number of Participants Minimum %
Problems Found

Mean % Problems Found

5 55 85.55
10 82 94.686
15 90 97.05
20 95 98.4
30 97 99
40 98 99.6
50 98 100

The table above shows the number of problems found relative to number of participants

Source: Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing

What More Should I Consider?

Now that you know 5-10 users is a good starting point, you’re probably wondering, “Will it be enough for my situation?” To figure that out, ask yourself the 4Ws and 1H when considering the appropriate sample size for your usability testing:

Why?

  • Tactical vs strategic goals:

    If it’s for tactical reasons, aiming for quick fixes and immediate improvements (like addressing urgent bugs), smaller, focused studies might be enough.

    If it’s for strategic reasons, informing long-term direction and understanding broader user behavior, you’ll likely need larger samples to get a more comprehensive view.

When?

  • Formative vs. Summative Evaluation:

    For early-stage formative testing (like checking your work), smaller samples work for quick iterations.

    For later-stage summative testing (like a final exam), larger samples may be better for a complete evaluation.

How?

  • Moderated vs. Unmoderated Testing:

    Moderated testing (like a guided interview) gives you rich data, potentially needing fewer participants.

    Unmoderated testing is more hands-off, so you might need more participants to get enough data.

 

  • Number of Testing Rounds:

    To gather enough data with limited time/budget, you might test more users per round.

    But iterative testing (multiple small tests) is often a more efficient approach. It allows for early issue detection, fix validation, and in-depth user behavior exploration.

Who?

  • Distinct User Groups:

    When testing products with different user groups (e.g., buyers and sellers), test with representatives from each. Each group has some shared behaviors but also unique needs. Testing 3-4 users per group is generally enough to capture the key differences, but your total sample size increases accordingly.

What?

  • Impact of Features:

    High-impact features (like payment flows or core functions) need larger sample size for thorough testing to avoid major problems.

    Low-impact features (like a “contact us” link) can be tested with fewer users. Think: major detour vs. sidewalk crack.

 

  • Likelihood of Occurrence of Issues:

    For major problems (potholes), a smaller sample may suffice.

    For subtle/rare issues (needles in a haystack), a larger sample is needed.

 

  • Complexity of the Product:

    Complex products with many features and user paths have more potential problems. To find a good chunk of those problems, you need more testers to try out different parts of the product. Imagine testing a simple app vs. a complicated enterprise software.

  • Testing Scope:

    Keep your sessions to around 60 minutes as users get tired. To test everything you need, prioritize features, test a small set at a time with 5 users, and repeat. This focused testing approach gives you better results than trying to test everything superficially.

usability testing sample size: factors in deciding your sample size

Consider the context of your usability testing when determining sample size.

Conclusion

So, there’s no single right answer to the “how many users?” question in usability testing. The five-user guideline can be helpful to get you going, but don’t stick to it blindly. To make sure your testing is effective and gives you useful results, consider the factors we’ve discussed and use iterative testing. This approach will help you get the user insights you need.

If you are interested in running usability testing or if you have any questions, contact Netizen Experience or read more about our user testing services for more information.

 

 

Recent Articles

How UX Research Is Reshaping Digital Banking Strategies in 2025

Imagine this: You urgently need to transfer money, but the banking app crashes mid-transaction. You restart it, but now you’re unsure—did the payment go through? Will you try again? For a moment, you feel a surge of panic. But take a deep breath and let’s zoom out for...

UX Research Challenges You Can’t Ignore

The rapid digitalisation across industries has made UX research more critical than ever. Poor usability can lead to serious consequences; whether it’s user frustration or losing revenue and trust in the company. But what happens when research itself becomes the...

Limitations of Generative AI in UX and How to Overcome Them

Generative AI is transforming UX research, automating tasks like transcribing interviews, analyzing data, and personalizing contents. It's a big shift from the old, manual ways of working; enabling teams to work more efficiently. But as we embrace AI, we also need to...

5 Stages of Design Thinking Process You Need to Know

Staying ahead of the curve means continually innovating and adapting. Entrepreneurs and mobile app developers often face the challenge of creating solutions that not only solve real problems— but also deliver exceptional user experiences. This is where design thinking...

10 Ways Fintechs Use Experience Design to Surpass Banking

Malaysia’s Fintech landscape is booming,  surpassing even the banking sector. Fintech companies place a lot of importance and emphasis on creating the perfect digital experience design ensuring that their customers receive the best user experience (UX) possible. Only...